It’s not only Trump supporters who are concerned about the precedent set by the Trump ban. influence, the company is going to have a hard time portraying itself as a neutral arbiter. However, it’s hard enough for governments and NGOs to define what constitutes a democratic or autocratic government, and it’s probably not a job we want to delegate to And given that Twitter and other social media companies are already often portrayed in many parts of the world as an agent of U.S. It’s tempting to say that Twitter should just have a “no dictator” policy. But the Trump ban is a major escalation and raises the question of whether a new precedent is being set. Security Council, a practice the company says it plans to extend to more governments. It also recently began labeling the accounts of government officials of the five permanent members of the U.N. Twitter has suspended state-linked accounts in a number of countries in the past, often without much explanation, and has gotten more aggressive about taking down individual tweets that violate rules. Twitter deleted the tweet over the weekend, without specifying what rule it had violated, though another one from the same day claiming that young people in Xinjiang benefit from the government’s policies remains. ![]() ![]() ![]() The day before President Donald Trump was permanently banned from the platform for violating the site’s “glorification of violence” policy, the Chinese embassy in the United States tweeted that Uighur women in the country’s Xinjiang region had been “liberated” by the Chinese government’s policies, and were no longer “baby-making machines”-a disturbing spin on a draconian campaign of population control that has involved the forced use of IUDs, sterilization, and abortion. If Twitter is going to start banning leaders and government officials for repeatedly justifying atrocities, the company is going to have its work cut out for it. This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |